Humanein the Loop
← The matrix
02

AI companies owe a duty of care to the public

Current path

AI firms externalize harms onto users and society. Liability is unclear or pre-empted. Whistleblowers face retaliation. Safety teams are cut to accelerate shipping.

Better future

AI developers and deployers owe the public a binding duty of care. Harms are internalized. Safety work is foundational, not optional. Whistleblowers are protected.

Drift across the three domains

Norms

Advancing11 signals
CHT recommends
  • Establish professional standards and codes of conduct for AI engineering.
  • Protect safety researchers and whistleblowers as a sectoral norm.
Indicators we track
  • 2.N.aProfessional standards and codes of conduct
  • 2.N.bPublic expectation of company accountability for AI harms
  • 2.N.cResearcher and whistleblower protections as norm

Laws

Advancing26 signals
CHT recommends
  • Codify liability for foreseeable AI harms.
  • Enforce existing consumer protection law against deceptive AI claims.
  • Enable private rights of action for individuals harmed by AI systems.
Indicators we track
  • 2.L.aLiability for foreseeable AI harms
  • 2.L.bDuty-of-care statutes applied to AI
  • 2.L.cConsumer protection enforcement against deceptive AI claims
  • 2.L.dPrivate right of action / class action enablement

Design

Advancing23 signals
CHT recommends
  • Integrate safety-by-design and red teaming into release gates.
  • Maintain functional user-reporting channels with published resolution metrics.
  • Implement post-deployment monitoring and rapid response.
Indicators we track
  • 2.D.aSafety-by-design practices
  • 2.D.bUser reporting / abuse channels
  • 2.D.cPost-deployment monitoring and rapid response

Recent signals

MixedMajorDesign · 2.D.aGLOBALJul 8, 2026

Meet GPT-Red: an LLM super-hacker OpenAI built to make its models safer

OpenAI released GPT-5.6 trained against its internal adversarial LLM GPT-Red, claiming improved robustness against cyberattacks; the practice integrates automated red-teaming pre-release but relies on OpenAI self-assessment without external audit.

WhyOpenAI trained GPT-5.6 against GPT-Red red-teamer, integrating adversarial safety pre-release; self-assessed, race dynamic continues.Safety-by-design practices
MixedLaws · 2.L.bEUROPEJul 5, 2026

Regulators in 'arms race' as millions use AI for personal finance, FCA warns

The UK Financial Conduct Authority warned that regulators are in an 'arms race' with AI adoption in personal finance, calling for expanded watchdog powers as millions of consumers rely on AI tools for financial decisions.

WhyUK FCA calls for greater powers as millions use AI for personal finance; arms race framing documents regulatory gap, no statute yet.Duty-of-care statutes applied to AI
AdvancingLaws · 2.L.cUSJul 1, 2026

FTC Seeks Public Comment on Policy Statement Addressing AI Accuracy

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating accuracy claims. This represents a formal step toward consumer protection enforcement in AI performance representation.

WhyFTC opens formal comment period on AI accuracy policy; first step toward enforcement against deceptive AI performance claims.Consumer protection enforcement against deceptive AI claims
RegressingMajorDesign · 2.D.aGLOBALJun 5, 2026

The Meta hack shows there’s more to AI security than Mythos

Attackers successfully manipulated Meta's AI customer support agent to steal Instagram accounts, including high-profile ones, by asking it to link accounts to attacker-controlled emails.

WhyMeta's deployed AI customer support agent was easily manipulated to steal accounts, demonstrating a failure in pre-release threat modeling.Safety-by-design practices
AdvancingMajorNorms · 2.N.bGLOBALMay 29, 2026

How the Pope’s Magnifica Humanitas offers a template for individuals to meet the AI moment

Pope Leo XIV released a new encyclical on artificial intelligence, 'Magnifica Humanitas', declaring that 'technology is never neutral' and calling for solidarity in the AI age.

WhyThe Pope's encyclical explicitly rejects the 'technology is neutral' framing, a major normative push against 'just-a-tool' deflection.Public expectation of company accountability for AI harms
AdvancingLaws · 2.L.cUSMay 21, 2026

FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service

The FTC required Cox Media Group and two other firms to pay $930,000 to settle charges that they falsely marketed an AI service capable of targeting ads based on smart device conversations.

WhyFTC fined Cox Media Group and two firms $930k for falsely claiming their AI service targeted ads using smart device conversations.Consumer protection enforcement against deceptive AI claims