▲AdvancingMajorLaws · 5.L.aUSOct 21, 2026
In 2026, six US states—Connecticut, Kentucky, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington—enacted laws limiting police use of AI-powered automated license plate readers, marking growing state legislative momentum against algorithmic mass surveillance infrastructure.
WhySix US states enacted 2026 laws limiting police ALPR use, advancing binding restrictions on AI-based mass surveillance.Biometric and facial recognition limits ▲AdvancingMajorLaws · 5.L.cUSOct 20, 2026
A federal court in New York issued a summary judgment ruling that OPM violated the Privacy Act by disclosing millions of federal employees' personal records to DOGE agents, with a court remedy still to be determined.
WhyUS federal court: OPM violated Privacy Act disclosing fed employee records to DOGE; first ruling against DOGE data access, remedy pending.Data protection strengthening ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSOct 19, 2026
EFF calls for courts and state legislatures to require police to obtain warrants before searching automated license plate reader (ALPR) data, arguing that these AI-powered surveillance systems build searchable location records of nearly everyone and must be subject to judicial oversight.
WhyEFF advocates warrant requirement for ALPR data, urging courts/legislatures to add judicial checks on AI-powered location surveillance.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSOct 15, 2026
A federal district court allowed EFF's lawsuit (on behalf of UAW, CWA, AFT) to proceed challenging the Trump administration's AI-driven surveillance of noncitizens' social media speech.
WhyFederal court denies govt motion to dismiss challenge to AI-powered social media surveillance of noncitizens; case advances.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSOct 14, 2026
A federal court allowed EFF's lawsuit challenging the 'Catch and Revoke' AI surveillance program—which used AI to monitor online speech and revoke visas of government critics—to proceed, marking a procedural win for civil liberties against AI-enabled speech suppression.
WhyCourt allowed EFF lawsuit vs 'Catch and Revoke' AI surveillance program; civil liberty challenge to government speech suppression.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties