▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSJul 17, 2026
Flock Safety ended its Distress Detection acoustic surveillance feature after EFF advocacy and community opposition, citing civil liberties concerns and potential illegality under state eavesdropping laws. The underlying acoustic gunshot detection network remains operational.
WhyEFF advocacy won: Flock Safety ended audio distress detection rollout; validates civil society pressure norms on AI surveillance.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.bGLOBALJul 10, 2026
EFF documents systemic failures in automated content moderation—including Meta's 77% misidentification of Arabic-language content—and calls for transparency, cultural competence, and appeals processes.
WhyEFF exposes documented algorithmic bias in auto-moderation: Arabic-language 77% false deletion; calls for transparency, appeals.Attention to algorithmic harms ▲AdvancingLaws · 5.L.bUSJul 9, 2026
The FTC settled with RentGrow for $2.25 million over FCRA violations including duplicate record reporting and failing to disclose data sources, reinforcing consumer data accuracy standards for algorithmic tenant screening decisions.
WhyFTC settles $2.25M with RentGrow for FCRA violations in tenant screening; enforces accuracy standards for algorithmic housing decisions.Algorithmic bias and discrimination protections ▼RegressingMajorDesign · 5.D.aUSJul 8, 2026
Meta is testing AI-powered 'super sensing' glasses capable of continuously capturing audio and video, raising a new front in the privacy fight over AI surveillance and who gets recorded.
WhyMeta tests AI glasses enabling continuous sensing — maximum capture by default, antithetical to minimization/on-device privacy-first design.Privacy-preserving design defaults ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSJul 2, 2026
EFF, Demand Progress, National Consumers League, and EPIC filed formal FTC comments opposing X Corp.'s petition to waive its 2022 privacy consent decree. The groups cited X's Grok AI model being trained on user data without meaningful consent as evidence the order remains necessary.
WhyEFF+3 allies file FTC comments to block X's bid to escape 2022 privacy decree; Grok AI training w/o consent citedPublic debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingMajorLaws · 5.L.cUSJun 29, 2026
The US Supreme Court ruled in Chatrie v. United States that Fourth Amendment privacy protections extend to location data from phone apps, even for short-term surveillance. The ruling restricts geofence warrants and establishes that app-generated records belong to users, with broad implications for digital privacy enforcement.
WhySCOTUS Chatrie ruling extends 4th Amendment to app location data; warrant required for short-term geofence surveillance.Data protection strengthening ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSJun 26, 2026
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has launched a campaign urging Grindr to make privacy the default and stop training AI on users' private data without explicit consent.
WhyEFF campaigns for Grindr to implement privacy-by-default and stop training AI on sensitive user data without opt-in consent.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSJun 25, 2026
The Electronic Frontier Foundation revealed that local police agencies using Flock Safety automated license plate readers can subscribe to an ICE-populated hotlist to scan for immigrants.
WhyEFF exposes local police use of Flock Safety ALPRs to scan for immigrants, increasing civil society scrutiny on automated surveillance.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aEUROPEJun 19, 2026
EFF and over 60 civil society organizations sent a letter to the UK government urging a halt to the planned deployment of Facial Age Estimation technology for assessing asylum-seeking children.
WhyEFF and 60+ civil society groups are applying sustained pressure on the UK government to halt facial age estimation at the border.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aGLOBALJun 19, 2026
EFF and partner organizations filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights against Paraguay for withholding information about its use of facial recognition surveillance.
WhyCivil society groups filed a formal complaint with an international human rights body challenging Paraguay's secret use of facial recognitioPublic debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ◐MixedNorms · 5.N.aUSJun 17, 2026
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and other civil society groups have signed a letter urging the Senate Judiciary Committee not to advance the NO FAKES Act, arguing it threatens free expression and could force workers to sign away their likeness rights.
WhyEFF and a civil society coalition oppose the NO FAKES Act, citing risks to free expression, satire, and workers' control over their likenessPublic debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ◐MixedMajorLaws · 5.L.aEUROPEJun 16, 2026
EU lawmakers have proposed a ban on AI nudifier applications, though questions remain about how such a ban will be enforced.
WhyEU lawmakers propose banning AI nudifiers, but unclear enforcement mechanisms make the practical impact ambiguous.Biometric and facial recognition limits ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSJun 11, 2026
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has announced its support for a California bill that would ban 'surveillance pricing,' a practice where companies use personal data to algorithmically charge different prices to different consumers.
WhyEFF supports California bill S.B. 2564 to ban surveillance pricing, showing civil society pushback against algorithmic surveillance.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingNorms · 5.N.aUSJun 10, 2026
The Electronic Frontier Foundation published a newsletter and podcast highlighting the mission creep of automated license plate readers and their testimony to Congress on AI surveillance.
WhyEFF highlights ALPR mission creep and testifies to Congress, applying civil society pressure against AI surveillance.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties ▲AdvancingMajorNorms · 5.N.aGLOBALJun 5, 2026
Following a WIRED report and public outcry, Meta released an update removing facial recognition code from its smart glasses companion app.
WhyJournalism and civil society pressure successfully forced Meta to remove facial recognition surveillance code from its smart glasses app.Public debate on AI surveillance and civil liberties